Topic guide

MDMA

Evidence, approval status, therapy protocols, safeguarding and trial-design questions surrounding MDMA-assisted approaches.

Start with context

MDMA is pharmacologically and legally distinct from classic psychedelics. Promising trial results do not remove concerns about cardiovascular effects, functional unblinding, therapist conduct, protocol delivery or regulator scrutiny.

Questions this topic raises

  • What did the pivotal PTSD trials report?
  • Why did the FDA decline the application?
  • How much of the intervention is drug, therapy or context?
  • What safeguarding systems protect participants?
  • How should strong expectancy affect confidence?

Read the evidence guides

MDMA-Assisted Therapy for PTSD: Evidence, Limits and Approval Status

What phase 3 trials reported, why the FDA did not approve the application and what remains unresolved.

Read the guide →

What Does “Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy” Really Mean?

A guide to preparation, monitored sessions, psychological support and integration.

Read the guide →

Therapists, Boundaries and Safeguarding in Psychedelic Research

Why altered states heighten safeguarding duties and what responsible oversight should include.

Read the guide →

Can Psychedelic Trials Really Be Blinded?

Understand functional unblinding, expectancy bias and the methods researchers use to limit them.

Read the guide →

Screening, Contraindications and Risk in Psychedelic Research

What clinical trials screen and monitor—and why selected study populations cannot be generalised.

Read the guide →

Psychedelic Medicine and UK Law: Research, Scheduling and Access

UK drug classes, schedules, research licences and the difference between trials and routine access.

Read the guide →

Keep the boundary clear

These guides are educational. They do not provide medical advice, personalised risk assessment, legal advice or instructions for using a controlled substance.